Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2025-06-09 14:22:57 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 72ACE73EAAB6F04F718FF8AA690300DF45D5C9A7E3F7077F49DBB8530DF6B7F7
Participant Details

Original Note:

Making threats/encouraging violence is obviously illegal, but “political rhetoric” like criticizing an arm of the gov is unambiguously protected by the First Amendment. It is unconstitutional for the government to demand that people stop criticizing it. https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/408/92/ https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/310/88/#101 https://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/first_amendment https://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/freedom_of_speech https://ahdictionary.com/word/search.html?q=Freedom+of+speech

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1931231647019553142
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 72ACE73EAAB6F04F718FF8AA690300DF45D5C9A7E3F7077F49DBB8530DF6B7F7
  • createdAtMillis - 1749478977665
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 193123164701955314272ACE73EAAB6F04F718FF8AA690300DF45D5C9A7E3F7077F49DBB8530DF6B7F7