Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2025-06-05 18:50:23 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 8EF1B892944A83C261085C5DBC2257F9C56787C0FCF3009B5C0D6FAFB54DF99C
Participant Details

Original Note:

As others noted, the claim in the post is that the quality and reliability of forecasts have been degraded by funding cuts and understaffing. The fact that forecasts are available does not contradict the original claim. The notes’ sources neither affirm nor refute the claim.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1930671652653683060
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 8EF1B892944A83C261085C5DBC2257F9C56787C0FCF3009B5C0D6FAFB54DF99C
  • createdAtMillis - 1749149423108
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 19306716526536830608EF1B892944A83C261085C5DBC2257F9C56787C0FCF3009B5C0D6FAFB54DF99C