Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2025-06-03 16:23:00 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 8509AFC203677DCB57C630A013AC2B3961AE353B648115F6A02D9AF547558D06
Participant Details

Original Note:

The note above citing NIST report is inherantly unreliable because it contains numerous “serious shortcomings,” “omissions,” and “major flaws” cited by numerous experts who have been calling for for a new investigation for 20+ years. https://www.c-span.org/program/book-tv/the-9-11-commission-report-omissions-and-distortions/152659

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1929895292108685618
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 8509AFC203677DCB57C630A013AC2B3961AE353B648115F6A02D9AF547558D06
  • createdAtMillis - 1748967780659
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 19298952921086856188509AFC203677DCB57C630A013AC2B3961AE353B648115F6A02D9AF547558D06