Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2025-06-02 15:45:40 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: B94F9AD677575B4C473640879948D5E74210F88D9A88D335840AE75A52E9966F
Participant Details

Original Note:

O auto tem um raciocínio binário q não é compatível com a metodologia usada para avaliação de vacinas. Discute se a vacina funciona 100% ou 0%. O autor ignora o risco da doença, comparado ao risco da vacinação. O objetivo na medicina é sempre oferecer o menor risco ao paciente. https://www.scielo.br/j/csc/a/RjvCPyxNCqhmTNJpWNNdMbS/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1929493660485267910
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - B94F9AD677575B4C473640879948D5E74210F88D9A88D335840AE75A52E9966F
  • createdAtMillis - 1748879140145
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 1929493660485267910B94F9AD677575B4C473640879948D5E74210F88D9A88D335840AE75A52E9966F