Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2025-06-03 01:33:59 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: B0E15ECDBBAE9F4CD9F2BA028E783B1D5460391C2D9F1676081EC7047C83E78D
Participant Details

Original Note:

O auto tem um raciocínio binário q não é compatível com a metodologia usada para avaliação de vacinas. Discute se a vacina funciona 100% ou 0%. O autor ignora o risco da doença, comparado ao risco da vacinação. O objetivo na medicina é sempre oferecer o menor risco ao paciente. https://www.scielo.br/j/csc/a/RjvCPyxNCqhmTNJpWNNdMbS/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1929493660485267910
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - B0E15ECDBBAE9F4CD9F2BA028E783B1D5460391C2D9F1676081EC7047C83E78D
  • createdAtMillis - 1748914439025
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 1
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 1929493660485267910B0E15ECDBBAE9F4CD9F2BA028E783B1D5460391C2D9F1676081EC7047C83E78D