Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2025-06-02 12:53:04 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 41DCA8F81962AAF954A8C60D049B05D9EAC4D1A1FD125F5691C989A080D053E6
Participant Details

Original Note:

科学の話題では客観的な証拠を用いて議論することが大事です 処理水の安全性は測定結果という客観的な証拠によって担保されています https://www.meti.go.jp/earthquake/nuclear/hairo_osensui/shirou_alps.html https://www.mofa.go.jp/mofaj/dns/inec/alps_navi01.html https://www.tepco.co.jp/decommission/progress/watertreatment/ これらの客観的な証拠は国際的にも妥当なものであると確認されています https://www.mofa.go.jp/mofaj/press/release/pressit_000001_01784.html 放射線や放射性物質についての基礎知識は副読本で学ぶことができます https://www.mext.go.jp/a_menu/shotou/housyasen/1410005_00004.html

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1929395082723266987
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 41DCA8F81962AAF954A8C60D049B05D9EAC4D1A1FD125F5691C989A080D053E6
  • createdAtMillis - 1748868784821
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 192939508272326698741DCA8F81962AAF954A8C60D049B05D9EAC4D1A1FD125F5691C989A080D053E6