Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2025-05-29 10:46:24 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 806CE01E074839F9FBC2B7EE19FDFD7ADA724C86C689447FBFFE67DF3DB16CAE
Participant Details

Original Note:

諮問の有無に関わらず、科学の話題では客観的な証拠を用いて議論することが大事です 処理水の安全性は測定結果という客観的な証拠によって担保されています https://www.meti.go.jp/earthquake/nuclear/hairo_osensui/shirou_alps.html https://www.mofa.go.jp/mofaj/dns/inec/alps_navi01.html https://www.tepco.co.jp/decommission/progress/watertreatment/ これらの客観的な証拠は国際的にも妥当なものであると確認されています https://www.mofa.go.jp/mofaj/press/release/pressit_000001_01784.html

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1928038777190240728
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 806CE01E074839F9FBC2B7EE19FDFD7ADA724C86C689447FBFFE67DF3DB16CAE
  • createdAtMillis - 1748515584578
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 1
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1928038777190240728806CE01E074839F9FBC2B7EE19FDFD7ADA724C86C689447FBFFE67DF3DB16CAE