Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2025-05-21 17:36:04 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 98F152AD07DC6D4C96724C2C0A36B382F0D86A0EBF5C37751B63AF5EF01DA71B
Participant Details

Original Note:

L’article cité, mentionne explicitement le fait qu’aucune irrégularité de vote n’a été constatée et qu’aucune pratique illégale n’a été employée https://l.franceinfo.fr/qE

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1925078485564805446
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 98F152AD07DC6D4C96724C2C0A36B382F0D86A0EBF5C37751B63AF5EF01DA71B
  • createdAtMillis - 1747848964563
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 192507848556480544698F152AD07DC6D4C96724C2C0A36B382F0D86A0EBF5C37751B63AF5EF01DA71B