Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2025-05-16 09:20:57 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 41DCA8F81962AAF954A8C60D049B05D9EAC4D1A1FD125F5691C989A080D053E6
Participant Details

Original Note:

ノートID 1922982743102943352 ”投稿者は「ワクチンの重症化予防効果等を含めて科学的根拠を否定する立場ではありません」と述べていますが、実際の言動と矛盾しています” 政策を見直したとポストに書かれています

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1923145549420822987
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 41DCA8F81962AAF954A8C60D049B05D9EAC4D1A1FD125F5691C989A080D053E6
  • createdAtMillis - 1747387257066
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 192314554942082298741DCA8F81962AAF954A8C60D049B05D9EAC4D1A1FD125F5691C989A080D053E6