Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2025-05-15 09:30:40 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: A4EA066EA24EE33ADDD68B0C3541F3ED69AF8CC5009B0355540FEA11F21D7089
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN: The article refenced is: https://www.mdpi.com/2076-393X/13/4/345 It raises considerable concerns based on non-human studies, with high quality outcome measures(histological). Human studies cited above rely on antral follical count(very high variance) and AMH ( only an index of ovarian activity).

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1922876183466869044
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - A4EA066EA24EE33ADDD68B0C3541F3ED69AF8CC5009B0355540FEA11F21D7089
  • createdAtMillis - 1747301440073
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1922876183466869044A4EA066EA24EE33ADDD68B0C3541F3ED69AF8CC5009B0355540FEA11F21D7089