Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2025-05-15 18:51:05 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 4C902452BE39908F07BDBDA11D4914E926D1DA1AED29EC57329D20E5A9A45BFF
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN: The article refenced is: https://www.mdpi.com/2076-393X/13/4/345 It raises considerable concerns based on non-human studies, with high quality outcome measures(histological). Human studies cited above rely on antral follical count(very high variance) and AMH ( only an index of ovarian activity).

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1922876183466869044
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 4C902452BE39908F07BDBDA11D4914E926D1DA1AED29EC57329D20E5A9A45BFF
  • createdAtMillis - 1747335065725
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 19228761834668690444C902452BE39908F07BDBDA11D4914E926D1DA1AED29EC57329D20E5A9A45BFF