Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2025-05-15 08:23:57 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 0DCBCAA977B6774E521BE1F89F40E7F9D3EA0AE38EA315D310D7ECB34DFA8549
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN: The article refenced is: https://www.mdpi.com/2076-393X/13/4/345 It raises considerable concerns based on non-human studies, with high quality outcome measures(histological). Human studies cited above rely on antral follical count(very high variance) and AMH ( only an index of ovarian activity).

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1922876183466869044
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 0DCBCAA977B6774E521BE1F89F40E7F9D3EA0AE38EA315D310D7ECB34DFA8549
  • createdAtMillis - 1747297437973
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 1
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 19228761834668690440DCBCAA977B6774E521BE1F89F40E7F9D3EA0AE38EA315D310D7ECB34DFA8549