Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2025-05-11 01:57:55 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: CEAF7063C6C99D6B0BBB3C003C94B13B9967473550DDA3E45D46CC0AD384E71A
Participant Details

Original Note:

This goes against standing Supreme Court rulings https://osc.gov/Documents/Hatch%20Act/Advisory%20Opinions/Federal/Candidate%20Visits%20to%20Federal%20Agencies.pdf

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1921022403682943225
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - CEAF7063C6C99D6B0BBB3C003C94B13B9967473550DDA3E45D46CC0AD384E71A
  • createdAtMillis - 1746928675688
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 1921022403682943225CEAF7063C6C99D6B0BBB3C003C94B13B9967473550DDA3E45D46CC0AD384E71A