Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2025-05-07 11:40:31 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 1D40281E9D252A15230A8AC05F5521C3B46E4A7EE65AF53B64E220ECF1F0CEDE
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN. This account is just posting an interview. And while the interview is filled with errors and irrelevant talking points, this tweet doesn’t need to have a community note and get demonetized

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1920008854156276154
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 1D40281E9D252A15230A8AC05F5521C3B46E4A7EE65AF53B64E220ECF1F0CEDE
  • createdAtMillis - 1746618031621
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 19200088541562761541D40281E9D252A15230A8AC05F5521C3B46E4A7EE65AF53B64E220ECF1F0CEDE