Birdwatch Note Rating
2025-05-07 03:27:01 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL
Rated by Participant: F8B534B70268C772682CAC8FABA9B44D04DF43D65B26EE31C17B4B60FADD9C9C
Participant Details
Original Note:
Miller’s statement is false under binding precedent of SCOTUS. In Zadvydas v. Davis & Mathews V. Diaz the court held “Even one whose presence in this country is unlawful, involuntary, or transitory is entitled to that constitutional protection.” https://www.law.cornell.edu/constitution-conan/amendment-5/removal-of-aliens-who-have-entered-the-united-states
All Note Details