Birdwatch Note Rating
2025-05-06 08:17:21 UTC - HELPFUL
Rated by Participant: F59044BA799DD54CC5FD73B615FAA04B7965BD9048075248727C00FE2B964B8E
Participant Details
Original Note:
Miller’s statement is false under binding precedent of SCOTUS. In Zadvydas v. Davis & Mathews V. Diaz the court held “Even one whose presence in this country is unlawful, involuntary, or transitory is entitled to that constitutional protection.” https://www.law.cornell.edu/constitution-conan/amendment-5/removal-of-aliens-who-have-entered-the-united-states
All Note Details