Birdwatch Note Rating
2025-05-06 09:42:07 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL
Rated by Participant: F4581B5F0512565A26F7C66C9372AC03E31F2E0341D170F6566667FCD870BAFB
Participant Details
Original Note:
Miller’s statement is false under binding precedent of SCOTUS. In Zadvydas v. Davis & Mathews V. Diaz the court held “Even one whose presence in this country is unlawful, involuntary, or transitory is entitled to that constitutional protection.” https://www.law.cornell.edu/constitution-conan/amendment-5/removal-of-aliens-who-have-entered-the-united-states
All Note Details