Birdwatch Note Rating
2025-05-07 07:00:44 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL
Rated by Participant: F338F09F837F1241934B7E032C5F2908A1A01124DE1EEC785CDCB55CBF4CABD5
Participant Details
Original Note:
Miller’s statement is false under binding precedent of SCOTUS. In Zadvydas v. Davis & Mathews V. Diaz the court held “Even one whose presence in this country is unlawful, involuntary, or transitory is entitled to that constitutional protection.” https://www.law.cornell.edu/constitution-conan/amendment-5/removal-of-aliens-who-have-entered-the-united-states
All Note Details