Birdwatch Note Rating
2025-05-06 13:58:35 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL
Rated by Participant: F266E0CEA1C3A777E8E45361F6E4F9BFA9BC3F4F98EB9D2B0073C4DE147AA680
Participant Details
Original Note:
Miller’s statement is false under binding precedent of SCOTUS. In Zadvydas v. Davis & Mathews V. Diaz the court held “Even one whose presence in this country is unlawful, involuntary, or transitory is entitled to that constitutional protection.” https://www.law.cornell.edu/constitution-conan/amendment-5/removal-of-aliens-who-have-entered-the-united-states
All Note Details