Birdwatch Note Rating
2025-05-06 03:08:42 UTC - HELPFUL
Rated by Participant: E8CE52D7EFE476D7F637B5F2C0CB4AD83C57D5A79D1636903856502B6F126CF3
Participant Details
Original Note:
Miller’s statement is false under binding precedent of SCOTUS. In Zadvydas v. Davis & Mathews V. Diaz the court held “Even one whose presence in this country is unlawful, involuntary, or transitory is entitled to that constitutional protection.” https://www.law.cornell.edu/constitution-conan/amendment-5/removal-of-aliens-who-have-entered-the-united-states
All Note Details