Birdwatch Note Rating
2025-05-06 04:54:27 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL
Rated by Participant: E6C9C2CB1943E663841002C304C4E95B04534F2F8B90E8447ABABB3FBF6C743A
Participant Details
Original Note:
Miller’s statement is false under binding precedent of SCOTUS. In Zadvydas v. Davis & Mathews V. Diaz the court held “Even one whose presence in this country is unlawful, involuntary, or transitory is entitled to that constitutional protection.” https://www.law.cornell.edu/constitution-conan/amendment-5/removal-of-aliens-who-have-entered-the-united-states
All Note Details