Birdwatch Note Rating
2025-05-06 04:27:13 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL
Rated by Participant: E1F1F1BC6C583642DFA4A7A17E6F03F5E711698E7458119619ACB3B88E4B4646
Participant Details
Original Note:
Miller’s statement is false under binding precedent of SCOTUS. In Zadvydas v. Davis & Mathews V. Diaz the court held “Even one whose presence in this country is unlawful, involuntary, or transitory is entitled to that constitutional protection.” https://www.law.cornell.edu/constitution-conan/amendment-5/removal-of-aliens-who-have-entered-the-united-states
All Note Details