Birdwatch Note Rating
2025-05-06 18:22:14 UTC - HELPFUL
Rated by Participant: DA5C0E33A45F1A44131B8CA2B8D49B025B93E5A7A99C75A07A5F63BB79883374
Participant Details
Original Note:
Miller’s statement is false under binding precedent of SCOTUS. In Zadvydas v. Davis & Mathews V. Diaz the court held “Even one whose presence in this country is unlawful, involuntary, or transitory is entitled to that constitutional protection.” https://www.law.cornell.edu/constitution-conan/amendment-5/removal-of-aliens-who-have-entered-the-united-states
All Note Details