Birdwatch Note Rating
2025-05-06 11:22:47 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL
Rated by Participant: D67DFAE64AC2D55045F57AE44A8B766B03443809893C1D7F22F3B116C53E7B2C
Participant Details
Original Note:
Miller’s statement is false under binding precedent of SCOTUS. In Zadvydas v. Davis & Mathews V. Diaz the court held “Even one whose presence in this country is unlawful, involuntary, or transitory is entitled to that constitutional protection.” https://www.law.cornell.edu/constitution-conan/amendment-5/removal-of-aliens-who-have-entered-the-united-states
All Note Details