Birdwatch Note Rating
2025-05-06 21:30:20 UTC - HELPFUL
Rated by Participant: D5A5107BBDF2DA5F26F6CA6EC4F9A0275BE3B734BD738C13111335B8BBC0799A
Participant Details
Original Note:
Miller’s statement is false under binding precedent of SCOTUS. In Zadvydas v. Davis & Mathews V. Diaz the court held “Even one whose presence in this country is unlawful, involuntary, or transitory is entitled to that constitutional protection.” https://www.law.cornell.edu/constitution-conan/amendment-5/removal-of-aliens-who-have-entered-the-united-states
All Note Details