Birdwatch Note Rating
2025-05-06 17:21:58 UTC - HELPFUL
Rated by Participant: D29F061BDB69B68DAECFF8DCF2B084DBD4A7DB7CB49F9C77CC8C5A67DB6AA225
Participant Details
Original Note:
Miller’s statement is false under binding precedent of SCOTUS. In Zadvydas v. Davis & Mathews V. Diaz the court held “Even one whose presence in this country is unlawful, involuntary, or transitory is entitled to that constitutional protection.” https://www.law.cornell.edu/constitution-conan/amendment-5/removal-of-aliens-who-have-entered-the-united-states
All Note Details