Birdwatch Note Rating
2025-05-06 02:30:35 UTC - HELPFUL
Rated by Participant: CEC52E5496DB4E92659D1E0FEC243E9AAC59A88C1B6D07829C5391220286F50F
Participant Details
Original Note:
Miller’s statement is false under binding precedent of SCOTUS. In Zadvydas v. Davis & Mathews V. Diaz the court held “Even one whose presence in this country is unlawful, involuntary, or transitory is entitled to that constitutional protection.” https://www.law.cornell.edu/constitution-conan/amendment-5/removal-of-aliens-who-have-entered-the-united-states
All Note Details