Birdwatch Note Rating
2025-05-06 01:55:25 UTC - HELPFUL
Rated by Participant: C7068A3D1B4C117C78EE699695E829DBDFC38745A452ED233A2BA951E8D5DDBF
Participant Details
Original Note:
Miller’s statement is false under binding precedent of SCOTUS. In Zadvydas v. Davis & Mathews V. Diaz the court held “Even one whose presence in this country is unlawful, involuntary, or transitory is entitled to that constitutional protection.” https://www.law.cornell.edu/constitution-conan/amendment-5/removal-of-aliens-who-have-entered-the-united-states
All Note Details