Birdwatch Note Rating
2025-05-06 20:11:26 UTC - HELPFUL
Rated by Participant: C36EC1BF47F9D4B1B995CDD5654FFEA7A2ABFAF63DC6A9467E4279FF0982E205
Participant Details
Original Note:
Miller’s statement is false under binding precedent of SCOTUS. In Zadvydas v. Davis & Mathews V. Diaz the court held “Even one whose presence in this country is unlawful, involuntary, or transitory is entitled to that constitutional protection.” https://www.law.cornell.edu/constitution-conan/amendment-5/removal-of-aliens-who-have-entered-the-united-states
All Note Details