Birdwatch Note Rating
2025-05-06 02:08:11 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL
Rated by Participant: C13ED21D8938EDCCCBEC40588FF58EF16E54873239B6FC0EEBA62FB218D8887D
Participant Details
Original Note:
Miller’s statement is false under binding precedent of SCOTUS. In Zadvydas v. Davis & Mathews V. Diaz the court held “Even one whose presence in this country is unlawful, involuntary, or transitory is entitled to that constitutional protection.” https://www.law.cornell.edu/constitution-conan/amendment-5/removal-of-aliens-who-have-entered-the-united-states
All Note Details