Birdwatch Note Rating
2025-05-06 02:46:11 UTC - HELPFUL
Rated by Participant: C13E4E22C96C4445ABFE2166E1103B41E60B85CB6FEEF2765612797D52DA543F
Participant Details
Original Note:
Miller’s statement is false under binding precedent of SCOTUS. In Zadvydas v. Davis & Mathews V. Diaz the court held “Even one whose presence in this country is unlawful, involuntary, or transitory is entitled to that constitutional protection.” https://www.law.cornell.edu/constitution-conan/amendment-5/removal-of-aliens-who-have-entered-the-united-states
All Note Details