Birdwatch Note Rating
2025-05-06 14:05:46 UTC - HELPFUL
Rated by Participant: BB8FC27B0A08121C24BCDE2C5D9007D6106E4E02F80FB66003F5B6A9CBD4CD8A
Participant Details
Original Note:
Miller’s statement is false under binding precedent of SCOTUS. In Zadvydas v. Davis & Mathews V. Diaz the court held “Even one whose presence in this country is unlawful, involuntary, or transitory is entitled to that constitutional protection.” https://www.law.cornell.edu/constitution-conan/amendment-5/removal-of-aliens-who-have-entered-the-united-states
All Note Details