Birdwatch Note Rating
2025-05-06 17:03:00 UTC - HELPFUL
Rated by Participant: B91E78C18AEFA132504F147E8B8133573683B48C655101EB339AC3E07F46D8A0
Participant Details
Original Note:
Miller’s statement is false under binding precedent of SCOTUS. In Zadvydas v. Davis & Mathews V. Diaz the court held “Even one whose presence in this country is unlawful, involuntary, or transitory is entitled to that constitutional protection.” https://www.law.cornell.edu/constitution-conan/amendment-5/removal-of-aliens-who-have-entered-the-united-states
All Note Details