Birdwatch Note Rating
2025-05-06 04:47:55 UTC - HELPFUL
Rated by Participant: B6AE319554955E878F77F2C59610F0635695C9B94B8B5B58CD35EDC93262668D
Participant Details
Original Note:
Miller’s statement is false under binding precedent of SCOTUS. In Zadvydas v. Davis & Mathews V. Diaz the court held “Even one whose presence in this country is unlawful, involuntary, or transitory is entitled to that constitutional protection.” https://www.law.cornell.edu/constitution-conan/amendment-5/removal-of-aliens-who-have-entered-the-united-states
All Note Details