Birdwatch Note Rating
2025-05-06 10:51:46 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL
Rated by Participant: B2EF1405F49176A7EC6B34F4E57FB47B293FE1D7CC5E94C1ACF5C18D0EF0F777
Participant Details
Original Note:
Miller’s statement is false under binding precedent of SCOTUS. In Zadvydas v. Davis & Mathews V. Diaz the court held “Even one whose presence in this country is unlawful, involuntary, or transitory is entitled to that constitutional protection.” https://www.law.cornell.edu/constitution-conan/amendment-5/removal-of-aliens-who-have-entered-the-united-states
All Note Details