Birdwatch Note Rating
2025-05-06 11:28:48 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL
Rated by Participant: B2466CD386F13560AD8599A89F8115D048D0A959C744190DDC6371643155EDA3
Participant Details
Original Note:
Miller’s statement is false under binding precedent of SCOTUS. In Zadvydas v. Davis & Mathews V. Diaz the court held “Even one whose presence in this country is unlawful, involuntary, or transitory is entitled to that constitutional protection.” https://www.law.cornell.edu/constitution-conan/amendment-5/removal-of-aliens-who-have-entered-the-united-states
All Note Details