Birdwatch Note Rating
2025-05-06 15:23:21 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL
Rated by Participant: B0ACF14B5A82C7487A97555BE0715FD27F77671A6B428A157425A7D07EC4679C
Participant Details
Original Note:
Miller’s statement is false under binding precedent of SCOTUS. In Zadvydas v. Davis & Mathews V. Diaz the court held “Even one whose presence in this country is unlawful, involuntary, or transitory is entitled to that constitutional protection.” https://www.law.cornell.edu/constitution-conan/amendment-5/removal-of-aliens-who-have-entered-the-united-states
All Note Details