Birdwatch Note Rating
2025-05-06 03:14:23 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL
Rated by Participant: AD1DD5890110EACA7A9BB70A53A42F7F5CE7A43939083C889ABB0104EBC55D57
Participant Details
Original Note:
Miller’s statement is false under binding precedent of SCOTUS. In Zadvydas v. Davis & Mathews V. Diaz the court held “Even one whose presence in this country is unlawful, involuntary, or transitory is entitled to that constitutional protection.” https://www.law.cornell.edu/constitution-conan/amendment-5/removal-of-aliens-who-have-entered-the-united-states
All Note Details