Birdwatch Note Rating
2025-05-06 17:05:29 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL
Rated by Participant: A4D6CE7426C4917973B37A6CB0A85710149CB1E86E0F619B2DC1F6D18413DDAE
Participant Details
Original Note:
Miller’s statement is false under binding precedent of SCOTUS. In Zadvydas v. Davis & Mathews V. Diaz the court held “Even one whose presence in this country is unlawful, involuntary, or transitory is entitled to that constitutional protection.” https://www.law.cornell.edu/constitution-conan/amendment-5/removal-of-aliens-who-have-entered-the-united-states
All Note Details