Birdwatch Note Rating
2025-05-06 14:22:20 UTC - HELPFUL
Rated by Participant: A16EF14C0E01932758CD70B5DB78A8BD27B8C4CF9C5E3D17181E836E922C5429
Participant Details
Original Note:
Miller’s statement is false under binding precedent of SCOTUS. In Zadvydas v. Davis & Mathews V. Diaz the court held “Even one whose presence in this country is unlawful, involuntary, or transitory is entitled to that constitutional protection.” https://www.law.cornell.edu/constitution-conan/amendment-5/removal-of-aliens-who-have-entered-the-united-states
All Note Details