Birdwatch Note Rating
2025-05-07 04:27:22 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL
Rated by Participant: A157DBD9104E1E79B83FEDC7D7D8BDC2330A95377CB527484C371B223731337A
Participant Details
Original Note:
Miller’s statement is false under binding precedent of SCOTUS. In Zadvydas v. Davis & Mathews V. Diaz the court held “Even one whose presence in this country is unlawful, involuntary, or transitory is entitled to that constitutional protection.” https://www.law.cornell.edu/constitution-conan/amendment-5/removal-of-aliens-who-have-entered-the-united-states
All Note Details