Birdwatch Note Rating
2025-05-06 04:00:28 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL
Rated by Participant: 9D9A17BCC2CE1B7101CADC5F2A8F271DEDDFB07FF2AD7395A774C70D04D0B32C
Participant Details
Original Note:
Miller’s statement is false under binding precedent of SCOTUS. In Zadvydas v. Davis & Mathews V. Diaz the court held “Even one whose presence in this country is unlawful, involuntary, or transitory is entitled to that constitutional protection.” https://www.law.cornell.edu/constitution-conan/amendment-5/removal-of-aliens-who-have-entered-the-united-states
All Note Details