Birdwatch Note Rating
2025-05-06 01:51:10 UTC - HELPFUL
Rated by Participant: 9D65AA858D85C64B3DACFCE3BDEC530A1509C079D222B4101E0495DE4E0487F9
Participant Details
Original Note:
Miller’s statement is false under binding precedent of SCOTUS. In Zadvydas v. Davis & Mathews V. Diaz the court held “Even one whose presence in this country is unlawful, involuntary, or transitory is entitled to that constitutional protection.” https://www.law.cornell.edu/constitution-conan/amendment-5/removal-of-aliens-who-have-entered-the-united-states
All Note Details