Birdwatch Note Rating
2025-05-06 14:27:43 UTC - HELPFUL
Rated by Participant: 9C8F35990743D2ECF7653D0EF03440BDA134F7932B1740B85609C0766EEFC2EE
Participant Details
Original Note:
Miller’s statement is false under binding precedent of SCOTUS. In Zadvydas v. Davis & Mathews V. Diaz the court held “Even one whose presence in this country is unlawful, involuntary, or transitory is entitled to that constitutional protection.” https://www.law.cornell.edu/constitution-conan/amendment-5/removal-of-aliens-who-have-entered-the-united-states
All Note Details