Birdwatch Note Rating
2025-05-07 04:50:10 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL
Rated by Participant: 97399B409736E3AF05F1DAB5BE48AB1431E4AB95F18BBD7470857ACA35DD65C1
Participant Details
Original Note:
Miller’s statement is false under binding precedent of SCOTUS. In Zadvydas v. Davis & Mathews V. Diaz the court held “Even one whose presence in this country is unlawful, involuntary, or transitory is entitled to that constitutional protection.” https://www.law.cornell.edu/constitution-conan/amendment-5/removal-of-aliens-who-have-entered-the-united-states
All Note Details