Birdwatch Note Rating
2025-05-07 01:15:37 UTC - HELPFUL
Rated by Participant: 8E95E3F70F1E09C87289611CC01FB773F80AE496FB96ED35F52A3C4B488AD0DD
Participant Details
Original Note:
Miller’s statement is false under binding precedent of SCOTUS. In Zadvydas v. Davis & Mathews V. Diaz the court held “Even one whose presence in this country is unlawful, involuntary, or transitory is entitled to that constitutional protection.” https://www.law.cornell.edu/constitution-conan/amendment-5/removal-of-aliens-who-have-entered-the-united-states
All Note Details