Birdwatch Note Rating
2025-05-06 19:57:37 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL
Rated by Participant: 8567B2911E56F7221FC791411D586CD7E319F6AF84C7257FFCA4C7E6703169D6
Participant Details
Original Note:
Miller’s statement is false under binding precedent of SCOTUS. In Zadvydas v. Davis & Mathews V. Diaz the court held “Even one whose presence in this country is unlawful, involuntary, or transitory is entitled to that constitutional protection.” https://www.law.cornell.edu/constitution-conan/amendment-5/removal-of-aliens-who-have-entered-the-united-states
All Note Details