Birdwatch Note Rating
2025-05-07 05:32:11 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL
Rated by Participant: 835201B397386A3C98F78C678E8854B8CE4824937F89E59595E23235B240D4E2
Participant Details
Original Note:
Miller’s statement is false under binding precedent of SCOTUS. In Zadvydas v. Davis & Mathews V. Diaz the court held “Even one whose presence in this country is unlawful, involuntary, or transitory is entitled to that constitutional protection.” https://www.law.cornell.edu/constitution-conan/amendment-5/removal-of-aliens-who-have-entered-the-united-states
All Note Details