Birdwatch Note Rating
2025-05-06 02:50:23 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL
Rated by Participant: 7DE2781AB05A7526A11309443FC9943A9C820BDDE682E72861CD559788A75486
Participant Details
Original Note:
Miller’s statement is false under binding precedent of SCOTUS. In Zadvydas v. Davis & Mathews V. Diaz the court held “Even one whose presence in this country is unlawful, involuntary, or transitory is entitled to that constitutional protection.” https://www.law.cornell.edu/constitution-conan/amendment-5/removal-of-aliens-who-have-entered-the-united-states
All Note Details