Birdwatch Note Rating
2025-05-06 09:52:18 UTC - HELPFUL
Rated by Participant: 7CAB1BB00302FF3474188E8D8024A10DD2E0B003F2F4A9BD26E144DA18E481AD
Participant Details
Original Note:
Miller’s statement is false under binding precedent of SCOTUS. In Zadvydas v. Davis & Mathews V. Diaz the court held “Even one whose presence in this country is unlawful, involuntary, or transitory is entitled to that constitutional protection.” https://www.law.cornell.edu/constitution-conan/amendment-5/removal-of-aliens-who-have-entered-the-united-states
All Note Details